Showing posts with label Huey Awards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Huey Awards. Show all posts

Saturday, July 22, 2017

THE RETURN OF THE HUEY'S

The Paramount Theatre in Cedar Rapids
Without a doubt, Iowa's most beautiful concert "palace."

In Summer 2011, I began an ongoing series of posts rating the programming of local "regional" orchestras (those within a three-hour drive from the home office in Dubuque, Iowa). Originally, I wrote that,

The "Huey awards" are arbitrary, based on my own criteria which include possible thematic content, the inclusion of both contemporary and American composers, and overall creativity and originality.  The latter would imply programs that step out of the Overture - Concerto - Symphony box.  Also of note is the presentation of works outside the standard repertory.  Why offer yet another performance of Dvorak 7 (or 8 or 9) or Shostakovich 5--regardless of my own love for those works--when there are hundreds of neglected works that may be favored by audiences (and surely the players)?  Do we need yet another performance of Beethoven 5 instead of say, the Bizet Symphonie?  Or what about the Franck--long a staple of the repertoire that now seems to be rarely played?  I could make a long list of neglected works, and that's just the works of the "masters."

And I made short mention of contemporary composers. For the record, my own programming over the past few years has included a concert of female composers (with another to come in 2018) and our Musica Nova, focusing solely on the music of the twenty-first century.

Last year I established criteria for scoring; this year that, to me, got cumbersome. So to change it up (it's my system anyway), discussion of each orchestra will include "highlights" and "lowlights," as well as a look at each ensemble's contributions outside "classical" concerts.

Greg Sandow, composer, teacher, critic, and mensch wrote a November blog post on how not to write a press release. In it, he states,

My Juilliard course this fall is well underway, and its title (slightly shortened for clarity) is “How to Speak and Write About Music.”

We read descriptions of music, by critics and others. We practice describing music I play in class.

And, in the spirit of entrepreneurship, we study press releases, bios, and program notes to see how they’re written. And — you knew this was coming if you’ve read me on these subjects — how they could be written better.

They do a terrible job, so many of them, describing the music they’re trying to sell.


For more, read here.

Much of the same could be said for a lot of the publicity generated by orchestras and other arts organizations. Seasons are often highlighted by a catch phrase that is either esoteric or almost incomprehensible. Others are simply too cute for their own good. It's also interesting to read of so called "alternative facts" on some organizational web sites. But that will be left up to the reader. I'm a notorious fact checker, so it's in my blood. That may be unimportant to others. To each his (or her) own.


What? And miss the great music?

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

The "Huey's" return....AN INTRODUCTION

In Summer 2011, I began an ongoing series of posts rating the programming of local "regional" orchestras (those within a three-hour drive from the home office in Dubuque, Iowa). Originally, I wrote that,

The "Hughes awards" are totally arbitrary, based upon my own criteria which include possible thematic content, inclusion of both contemporary and American composers and overall creativity and originality.  The latter would imply programs that step out of the Overture - Concerto - Symphony box.  Also of important note is the presentation of works outside the standard repertory; i.e. why offer yet another performance of Dvorak 7 (or 8 or 9) or Shostakovich 5--regardless of my own love for those works--when there are hundreds of neglected works that may be favored by audiences (and surely the players).  Do we need yet another performance of Beethoven 5 instead of say, the Bizet Symphonie?  Or what about the Franck--long a staple of the repertoire that now seems to be rarely played?  I could make a long list of neglected works and that's just the works of the "masters."

That first year there was no total offering worthy of an award for creative orchestral programming. In subsequent years, however, the cream rose to the top:
  • 2012: Waterloo-Cedar Falls Symphony
  • 2013: (In Jason Weinberger's first year as MD and CEO): Waterloo-Cedar Falls
  • 2014: WCF (Yes, again!)
  • 2015: Same old story: WCF.

This year I am introducing a scoring system that should provide a more accurate gauge of each orchestra's programming choices. It goes something like this:

  • + 20, starting score per concert.
  • - 5, no deviation from the standard "overture-concerto-symphony" format.
  • - 5, no works outside the "traditional" repertoire.
  • + 5, for each contemporary work or American work outside the "canon."
  • + 5 - 10, Judge's choice for a concert program of particular merit.
To determine the total score, individual concert scores are totaled and divided by the total number of concerts. This maintains equity among the ensembles, some of which may offer five "classical" concerts and others, many more.

As a reminder, the rated orchestras include:
  • Des Moines Symphony
  • Dubuque Symphony
  • Madison (WI) Symphony
  • Orchestra Iowa (Cedar Rapids)
  • Quad City Symphony (Davenport)
  • WCF Symphony (Cedar Falls)
Tomorrow: the Des Moines and Dubuque Symphonies square off: Giunta vs. Intriligator.